Tremaine Cooper — Appropriate Levels of Cross-Country

One of our big goals on Eventing Nation is to help the many different elements of the eventing community understand each other better by providing an open forum for discussion.  In this spirit, it is a pleasure to welcome cross-country course designer Tremaine Cooper for a guest article on the differences between levels from a course designer’s perspective.  Tremaine, of Hardwick, MA, has designed courses for many fantastic events over the years, including Poplar Place Horse (GA), Millbrook Horse Trials (NY),  Puhinui Horse Trials (New Zealand),  Morven Park (VA), Plantation Field (PA), and Southern Pines (NC).  I had the pleasure of meeting Tremaine for the first time at Millbrook last year after I popped off in the middle of Tremaine’s advanced coffin.  It was Saturday night and I was obsessively walking the line I had missed–Tremaine drove up on a tractor and we struck up a conversation about  the possibility of course designer guest articles for Eventing Nation.  Thanks for writing this Tremaine and thank you for reading:
—-
photo(6).jpg

One of Tremaine’s jumps at Poplar

From Tremaine:

One of the most important aspects of course design, even at the upper levels is education.   Hopefully upon completing a course you are on a better horse than when you left the start box.  Conversely even a good horse can be turned off to going cross country if they are run over uninviting, trappy courses, or tracks that are not appropriate for the level.

One complaint or comment of some courses is that there is a big jump between the levels, especially from Training to Prelim.  To determine what is appropriate at each level, one must always start at the top.  Even if a designer will never design an Advanced track, they must have an understanding of what is being asked at that level.  Then they must take a step back and ask themselves what skills must we ask at the proceeding levels to prepare the competitors to answer those questions.  This process can be continued all the way down to Beginner Novice.

One example of this can be seen in combinations.  A simple bounce is introduced at the Prelim level.  Since this is the first time that the horse has seen this in competition, the designer should try to place it in a helpful location – off a bend and up a slight hill will help to balance the horse – and they should use solid inviting material.  It is ideal if they have a good experience while first learning this exercise.  Taking this back to Training, it is important that they practice jumping a combination at one stride.  It is not seen often, but a bounce step, which is much more forgiving than two uprights, can be a good question at training as long as it is not a first of the season or move up event. The next step back would be two related jumps at two or three strides at Novice.

This progression can be applied to many different types of jumps, be it water, ditches or corners.  The most important thing is that if this is the first time that this question is being asked, that it be asked fairly, and not in conjunction with another question.  An example of that would be it is fair to have a proper corner at the Prelim level.  It is also fair to have a jump where the take off and landing is in water at Prelim.  I do not believe though that it is right to ask a water to water corner at Prelim.

On the other hand, one must look at the whole picture of the question being asked.  Look at a corner in a combination.  A jump a number of strides before the corner can help by putting you on a good line and on the proper stride, or it can ask for a slightly more open stride (harder) or a more difficult line.

So while courses should not ask questions above the given level, I also think that a designer is not doing any one a favor making a course too easy for that level.  If I were to run a horse at a number events where none of the jumps were up to size and few questions were asked it might give me a sense of false security and give me the impression that we were ready to move up a level.

One more comment about ‘move up’ events.  There is nothing wrong with a course that is straight forward, but if the level is Prelim, then they should be jumping Prelim jumps – not 3’3″ ones with green flags.  If a horse is going prelim it needs to be able to jump 3’7″.

As a final thought, a designer is not out there to trick people.  We want to provide good sport but there is nothing more satisfying than a good horse ridden well over ones course making it all look easy.  Actually, it is most satisfying to be on that horse! 

Categories:

Eventing Guest Writers, Eventing Nation
  • CP

    Interesting article - thank you. So much more needs to be written about what all the different expectations are at each level. Oh so scary to hear folks simply read the jump heights/speeds for a level out of the Eventing rules Appendix and think they've got a handle on what it takes to ride that level. I'd love to see this type of additional advice rolled into the USEA's XC Obstacle Design Standards documentation! Maybe call them Guidelines...- not necessarily for the benefit of knowledgeable course designers but for the less informed eventing public! Of course with the caveat - consult with a professional!

  • CP

    And that jump in the photo is so AWESOME!

  • Marty

    Thanks John and TC. I hope that this is the first of many behind the thoughts of course design.
    Love the quality jumps and tracks at Poplar at every level. Every time I rode a new track at Poplar with a new question that seemed daunting actually rode the best. Hard to say that about the other local Events/CD's.

  • Retreadeventer

    At a clinic with Phillip, we discussed the gap between Training and Preliminary levels. Can Tremaine discuss that gap and why it's so wide, and a specific blueprint -- what a CD will do to a course -- that prepares a Training level horse/rider combination for Preliminary?
    I have walked Training level XC courses with the prelim course fences generally next to each other...and looked from the Train. level fence to the prelim fence and went, "HUH?" How does that little log (Train.) prepare a horse for that big, groundline-less, solid looking uphill Prelim. bounce over there?

  • LR

    We saw a couple courses this year that were billed as "average" and ended up being tricky courses with questions that may have been a bit much for a novice horse.

    When we voiced our opinions, we got the same answer, each time "Well, it's not illegal." As in "Well, its not explicitly written that you CAN'T have that at novice." Which begs the question... how do you differentiate between "legal" and "appropriate?"

  • anonym

    Great article!
    Correct me if Im wrong but isn't it jumps like the one in the photo that are the root of some of the problems with xc courses?
    What is the question when the fence is built to be some alien animal with brush out it's back?

  • Anonymous

    The question seems to be a log with brush which is more natural / safer / inviting than a box table made out of boards. And don't sponsors love this kind of stuff? Want that prize money keep the sponsors happy.

  • RCZ

    I've actually jumped that jump coming out of the water in a shady spot and it rode great! exactly like its supposed to, a log with brush to keep their eye up.

  • CherylH

    This article is great! Please bring more like this!