The much anticipated Eventing 2016-2026 USEA Summit and Town Hall Meeting took place Saturday morning at the USEA Annual Meeting & Convention in Washington, D.C., with lively discussion on the following topics: Eventing Costs, Membership Growth, Organizers, 21st Century Sport/Business, Calendar/Pricing, ICP/Education, Professionals and Adult Amateurs.
We published live updates throughout the three hours of this meeting, so read on for a full summary of what went down.
9:10: Kevin Baumgardner, our moderator for the Summit, just kicked off things with an introduction to the format. This is going to be a three-hour process, with time for comments, brainstorming and ultimately break-out sessions to further discuss the following topics: Eventing Costs, Membership Growth, Organizers, 21st Century Sport/Business, Calendar/Pricing, ICP/Education, Professionals, Adult Amateurs.
Then after the breakout sessions there will be more feedback from the audience. Here we go!
9:15: Derek di Grazia spoke first on the high cost of competing. He made the point that it’s not cheap to own a horse, and it’s also not cheap to have a horse on the road and competing. But he believes cost-saving measures can be implemented.
Many events on the East Coast run over one day or two days. Further west, many events run over multiple days, and on the West Coast most events run over three days. Holding competitions over more days means higher costs, i.e. increased nights in a hotel, meals, stabling.
More days away competing = higher costs, and Derek suggested having more events run over fewer days.
9:20: Brian Sabo next addressed how to grow USEA membership. Rather than trying to bring unrecognized competitors into the fold to grow membership, Brian believes that the key to growing membership is to get kids into the sport at a very young age by starting a beginner program.
Working with kids also means their parents become an active part of the sport. Those are the people who ultimately go on to volunteer, train to become officials and ultimately sit on committees, which is all key for the growth of the sport in the U.S.
9:30: Wendy Wergeles, Jane Barron and Jeffrey Ryding all spoke on behalf of the proposed Council of Event Organizers (CEO), which is seeking to provide a committee for organizers that will allow them to work together and communicate more efficiently.
Jane said, “In Area 3, we have a very difficult challenge, being in a fortunate situation of having too many events who want to run recognized competitions on the weekends in a very short spring calendar when the snow birds are in Aiken or Florida. We also are contiguous with Area 2 and 8. There is a migration among the three areas. Their events also have an impact on where the competitors go, and that’s important.”
“Thinking of competitors, we don’t have the greatest sequencing of events up and down the East Cost to make it less expensive for competitors and more rational for those trying to gain their qualifications.”
As Jeffrey put it: “We don’t want to compete as organizers; we want to come together as organizers.” With that in mind, the first CEO meeting will be held from 2-3 p.m. this afternoon in the Governor’s meeting room.
9:40: Howard Simpson spoke about how to make it more possible to attract lower level unrecognized competitors to recognized events. There is a proposal that a focus group should be created to facilitate with lower entry fees with reduced rules and regulations. The same idea has also been supported for the upper levels.
“We believe that if low-cost divisions can be created with common sense regulations and rules, it would attract some of the competitors currently competing at recognized events,” Howard said.
9:50: Rob Law also spoke on how to attract lower level adult amateurs who only competes at unrecognized events to start competing in recognized competitions. “They want value and are price sensitive. They want an experience that matches their lifestyle and need. We need to be flexible. We need to fit what they want.”
Unrecognized shows give competitors “a la carte choices,” much lower costs and are often held over one day. They also allow organizers to be “innovative without restriction” and require fewer volunteers while having good participation rates and being profitable. “It’s a primary source for new growth in the sport,” Rob said.
9:55: Jeannie Clarke spoke on behalf of the USEA Instructors’ Certification Program (ICP). “The ICP program has been very valuable for me because of the connection with other people of similar values. It gave me confidence and structure to run a business. I am asking those instructors and those of you with needs and ideas for the sport to get more involved. “
10:05: Tamie Smith was asked to speak on behalf of the Professional Horseman’s Council. “We are capable of working together to develop a sport that is mutually inclusive, not exclusive” — and a sport in the U.S. that is capable of being a world leader in eventing once more. It is not amateurs versus professionals. “The amateurs are part of that dream (to get back on the podium). We were once you. We stand on your shoulders.”
On the needs of professionals: “When we say we need better footing, it’s because we want to keep our horses sound. When we say we need more FEI qualifiers, it’s because we want to stand at the top of the leaderboard. When we say the ground on cross country is too firm, it’s because the well-being of our horses is our livelihood, and they mean everything to us.”
“We share a common passion for our sport. We need to focus on how we can help organizers improve the footing and how to help amateurs and striving Olympic hopefuls afford to stay in the sport.”
10:15: Siobhan O’Brien spoke on behalf of the adult amateurs and said many of the comments already made at the Summit today reflect the same concerns shared by the adult amateurs, like the cost of competing as well as the number of days competitions are running.
She also mentioned level creep (the idea that lower level courses are becoming more difficult and less inviting) as a concern and said they would love to see more educational opportunities for volunteers (on that note, don’t forget the Volunteer Initiatives session at 4:30 p.m. this afternoon).
“Adult amateurs are about enjoyment. We want to have fun.” With that in mind, the new proposed DX Eventing division, which would include a dressage test with a hybrid show jumping and cross country course, has been very popular among the adult amateurs. “It’s more cross country at a lower cost,” she said.
“We’re excited to support the professionals in our sport,” she said. “That’s what gives us the excitement of going to Rolex and Fair Hill and the other big shows.”
10:30: After a brief break, Kevin opened the floor for comments from the audience, with Malcom “Vanna White” Hook running the microphone around the room.
Cyndi Kurth from Area 3 posed this question to the professionals: “What are you bringing to the table for organizers? How are you fundraising? How are you helping them get something you need to qualify?” (Cue applause)
Karen O’Connor responded: “I don’t think I can ever remember being asked by an organizer to help with fundraising. I think a lot of competitors will help. But we haven’t up until now been able to come to a roundtable where we all have the same goal. I really believe that if we are asked, we will step up to the plate.” (More applause)
10:35: Open comments still going. Gina Miles also addressed the question about what professionals are bringing to the table for organizers: “We bring a lot of customers. We want to bring customers to your event. That’s how we make money. We want to bring as many competitors as we can. When you talk about good footing and rings, that’s not just what the professionals are asking for, that’s what our customers are asking for. Every single one of my amateur customers wants good footing for their horses.”
10:40: More crowd comments. Kathy Kerns said that all volunteers want “is a little recognition,” which got a lot of applause from the crowd. She suggested that if events want to give T-shirts to volunteers that they should follow Queeny Park’s model and give them the shirt with “volunteer” on it as soon as they get on the grounds. Mel Litter then commented and suggested a points leaderboard for volunteers, which got a lot of applause. (Great idea!)
10:45: More crowd comments. Denis Glaccum said that organizers should get professional riders involved on their committees and take advantage of what they can bring to the table. “Boyd (Martin) and Phillip (Dutton) came onto the committee at Plantation Field. We don’t always agree, but they’ve been an unbelievably positive influence in making the CIC better.”
Denis also offered a suggestion on how to show recognition and appreciation to volunteers based on Plantation Field’s model. John Nunn donates a Bit of Britain gift certificate for every horse trials at Plantation Field, and every volunteer’s name goes into a hat for the winner to be drawn. At the end of the season, every volunteer from the year is eligible for a drawing to win $1,000 to go to Rolex.
Lastly, Denis said that “a good lunch” is always an excellent way to show volunteers you appreciate them, which got a lot of love from the crowd. (Totally agree on good food being important!)
10:50: We now have breakout sessions going at the back of the room for everyone to discuss the topics that have been addressed so far this morning: Eventing Costs, Membership Growth, Organizers, 21st Century Sport/Business, Calendar/Pricing, ICP/Education, Professionals, Adult Amateurs. Lots of chatter going on right now! Stay tuned for more.
11:15: We’re just a few minutes from getting back underway with feedback from the breakout sessions.
11:20: Each table will get three minutes to explain their three best, constructive brainstorming ideas to address their topic. First up is Calendar/Pricing.
11:22: The consensus in the Calendar/Pricing group is that the calendars need to be split into the two sides of the sport, each having their own calendar. One group wants the free market with both calendars. Another requested a ranking system so existing competitions can establish their precedence in the marketplace. There was also a request to consider restructuring the calendar by areas of eventing action and activity that transcends area boundaries.
11:25: Those in the ICP/Education breakout session agreed that the “unrecognized question” is a big one, and ICP is willing to help in whatever way they can. More communication between unrecognized/recognized organizers is one suggestion on the table.
Another suggestion: have a bulletin board at events with contact information for an ICP representative who is available to answer questions on use of studs, how to ride the water, what line to take, etc. That provides someone in addition to the rider rep who is there for simple questions from someone who wants a qualified opinion.
Third suggestion: ICP individuals could help organizers add a short skill-building class to events (like a show jumping lesson/clinic) “for the many people who exist who are riders who want to event but know they’re not yet skilled enough to actually do it.”
Finally: Hold Event Colleges at area championships.
11:30: Those in the Professionals group said they believe professionals aren’t doing a good enough job of showing what they can give back to the sport. They are involved in a lot of ways, but they want to make sure it’s in a way that is benefitting everyone. “What do you need from us? We’re willing to do it,” Tamie said. (Totally agree that the dialogue here is key!)
The professionals want to continue supporting and expanding the Event Colleges in order to interact and help educate amateurs at key events, i.e. leading seminars, course walks, etc.
11:33: Ruth Bley spoke for the 21st Century Sport/Business table: “We’re in a business to provide a sport, and I think everyone need to be educated that the organizers are running a business.” Can experienced organizers help educate new organizers? Can the professionals have better business models so they can bring in new riders to the sport, work with current clients and still maintain their competitive careers?
11:35: From the Adult Amateurs table: “We want this referred to as ‘our sport,’ not ‘our hobby.'” They want to see true amateur divisions in all areas. They also want value. Sometimes you get eliminated in dressage or show jumping for “doing something that wasn’t unsafe.” Some organizers will let competitors still run cross country and some won’t. Can it be listed in the omnibus if events will allow riders in this situation to still go cross country, or can rules be reconsidered? Level creep also remains a big concern.
11:37: From the Eventing Costs table: For recognized events, the entry fee is $210. For unrecognized, it’s $90. The following things drive up the cost of recognized events: hiring officials, recognizing and rewarding the volunteers, prize money, farriers on site, ambulance costs, and USEA fees. The recommendation is to look at each of these expenses to determine if there is a way to drive the costs down or control them.
11:40: The Membership Growth table discussed how to “sell the USEA to the unrecognized competitor.” Riders who are in an area where there aren’t a lot of recognized events don’t have an incentive to join the USEA and compete in recognized competitions. A different level of membership for riders in those areas was suggested. They would also like to see a similar concept to the USDF Affiliates program.
The ICP program can also facilitate more riders into membership through discounts. Another idea is to have more events offer Starter/Intro levels. If courses can be kept more inviting and straightforward at the lower levels, then riders would feel more encouraged to join and compete in recognized competitions without the fear of being eliminated.
11:42: A lot of specific concerns about individual events came out of the Organizers table. They are proposing that the Council of Event Organizers become a voice to listen to to all the concerns, come up with solutions and help get them resolved.
Organizers also feel like they’re having a hard time communicating with their competitors and volunteers during the competition. Ways to help with that are email blasts (through Constant Contact or MailChimp), using the area website or their own websites (but that info needs to be in the omnibus), and getting email addresses from the USEA.
The concept of a volunteer leaderboard was well supported. As Wendy Wergeles put it: “Get something done through your area or pound on the USEA to get one done through the national office. It would be great to see the volunteers get the recognition they deserve because without them we couldn’t do these competitions.” Well said!
11:47: That concludes the Summit! What do you think of the discussion, EN? Let us know in the comments below. Our moderator Kevin Baumgardner wrapped things up by saying: “We are one sport.” Let’s now work together to make eventing in the U.S. stronger and better than it’s ever been. Go Eventing.